Breaking Down the 2027 Physician Fee Schedule

CMS just dropped the CY 2027 Physician Fee Schedule, so here’s (mostly) everything you need to know about what made it into the final cut.

First things first. Medicare payment rates for most doctors are getting a 2.3% cut in 2027, while docs enrolled in alternative payment models will see rates drop 1.8%.

  • Both cuts are deeper than originally proposed, and as you might expect, providers slammed them immediately.

Now, about those RPM changes. Third-party RPM vendors are still “offside,” even if the soccer metaphors are already feeling a bit dated since we first covered the proposed changes during the World Cup.

The proposed rule pinned skyrocketing Medicare costs and widespread waste primarily on vendors:

  • Medicare would only reimburse RPM and RTM when they’re performed by clinical staff employed by the billing practice, not third-party companies (pretty much every RPM company we’ve ever covered).
  • Medicare would also require a separate visit to kick off any remote monitoring episode, limiting the service to patients that have an established relationship with the billing practice.

That’s still happening. It’s just not happening for two more years:)

  • Direct Employee Proposal: “After consideration of public comments, we are finalizing that for the purposes of billing Medicare, beginning January 1, 2029, the RPM and RTM codes cannot be billed in cases where the service is not performed by clinical staff that is a direct employee of the practitioner or the practitioner’s practice and contracting out to third-party companies will not be allowed after that time.”
  • Established Patient for RTM Proposal: “We continue to believe that an established patient requirement ensures that the practitioner would possess information needed to understand the current medical status and needs of the patient prior to ordering RTM services.” 
  • Initiating Visit Proposal: “RPM or RTM services must furnish a separately reportable initiating visit in association with the onset of RPM or RTM services….” The initiating visit doesn’t have to be for the sole purpose of discussing RPM or RTM.

The Takeaway

Pay cuts and can kicking, not sure what else you could have expected.

Innovation Shouldn’t Have to Wait for Epic

It’s always tough to pass up a hitpiece from STAT assassins Casey Ross and Brittany Trang, especially when their mark is the biggest EHR in the world.

Inside Epic’s Empire. That’s the name of the new series covering Epic’s “uncompromising business tactics” that have crushed competitors, thwarted innovation, and put a single business in charge of the patient data needed to power medical breakthroughs.

Ross and Trang get right down to business. They set the stage with Epic’s total dominance:

  • Epic pulls in $6.5B+ a year.
  • It holds records on 8 in 10 Americans.
  • It owns 55% of inpatient beds, up from just 21% in 2012.

Some might see that as a problem. Executives at 12 companies on Epic’s own app marketplace say it undercut them by withholding data interfaces and specs, spreading rumors about their products, or charging fees in the hundreds of thousands a year.

  • Epic declined interviews but countered with its top KLAS rating for integration, triple the connections that federal law requires, and billions of annual data exchanges.

The gate is locked from the inside. Vendors wanting deep integration sign an agreement acknowledging Epic might build software similar to theirs, forcing them to choose between IP protection and distribution.

  • Certain medication and problem-list data sit behind proprietary interfaces Epic keeps private, and public APIs can reportedly book an appointment but not cancel one.
  • Epic’s new connectors let its AI agents read and write to third-party apps, but STAT couldn’t confirm whether third-party agents get the same into Epic.

Exhibit A is Abridge. In 2023 Epic made the then-scribe startup its first Partners and Pals member and took an equity stake, then rival scribe vendors say their Epic business evaporated. 

  • Abridge raised a boatload of capital and grew to hundreds of health systems.
  • Epic cashed out, shuttered the program, and announced its own scribe.
  • Dayton Children’s CIO J.D. Whitlock summed it up by saying Epic clones have most of a third party’s features, costs less, and integrates better… because it’s Epic.

There’s another side of the coin. Former Epic employee turned Health API Guy Brendan Keeler argues Epic isn’t uniquely evil, just dominant enough that the bar for sharing data should be higher. 

  • Another former Epic employee says the friction is deliberate, built to keep vendors from corrupting the record, with developer frustration an acceptable price.

The Takeaway

At the end of the day, it’s tough to hate the player and not the game. Epic is running a business, and it’s running it pretty well given the rules that it’s given. Then again, it might also make the rules.

Get the top digital health stories right in your inbox